Skip to content

How we scope, build and hand over

This is the standard we hold ourselves to. It's published so you can hold us to it too — and so you can compare it against whatever else you're considering.

01

Scoping

We start by defining what “wrong” looks like, because you cannot guard against a failure you haven’t named. For an automation that means the malformed record, the rate limit, the duplicate event. For an agent it means the question nobody anticipated and the answer that is confidently incorrect.

Scope is written as what is in and what is explicitly out. The out-of-scope list is the more useful half — it is what prevents a fixed price from becoming a fight later.

02

Evaluation before implementation

On AI work, the evaluation suite is built before the agent. A graded test harness, run on every change, so quality is measured rather than felt.

You set the bar with us. We ship when the numbers clear it — not when the demo looks good.

03

Guardrails

Input validation, output constraints, refusal behavior, and cost and token ceilings. Human review on the decisions where being wrong is expensive.

We do not build fully autonomous systems for decisions with real financial, legal or safety consequences. That is a standing refusal, not a negotiating position.

04

Failure handling

Every external call gets error handling and retries. Everything that can fail silently gets a dead-letter path. Anything running unattended gets monitoring on its failure modes, not just its uptime.

This is roughly 40% of the work on an automation and it is the part most vendors skip, because it is invisible in a demo.

05

Named accountability

One senior engineer owns the engagement. They sign off on architecture, evaluation design, the security surface, the handover documentation, and the decision to go live.

You know who that is before you sign. If they change, that is a conversation with you — not an internal reassignment.

06

Handover

Architecture, decisions, prompts and eval cases where relevant, a credentials map, and a runbook. Written to be read by someone who wasn’t there.

Handover documentation is a deliverable, not a favour. Taking the work in-house later is a legitimate outcome and we build for it.

07

After launch

Thirty days of post-launch fixes are included on every engagement. Beyond that, a care plan or you run it — both are fine, and we will hand over the monitoring configuration either way.

On a plan, we contact you first. If something breaks, you hear it from us with the cause, the fix, and what we changed so it doesn’t recur.

Want to see this applied to your problem?

Thirty minutes with the engineer who'd own the build.

Book a build review